6. post hoc,ergo prepter hoc = after this,therefore because of thisP46 47,P55 81

7. concurrence1 P36 5,P50 61

8. incomplete comparison or selective comparison P54 78

9. composition and pision

composition：把个体特点不适合的移植到整体上

pision：把群体特点简单的移植到个体上

P48 55

最后段的写作：

两项任务：

1、指出原论者未能有效的支持我们的结论

2、指出原论者可以从正文剖析的几个方面加大原论证

针对正文几个TOPic sentence作者应在这几个方面加大

Module：p75-p79

Issue （是非问题）

Strategy：P67

选题：

构思：brainstorm

开头：陈述问题背景，指源于己论点

正文：2~3段，分别支持自己立场

1、每段要有一个主题

2、展开论述

3、复杂性，让步，修正

4、用信号词

结尾：

语言问题：check P68

Brainstorm2迅速构思

1、从大脑里调出尽量多的有关信息

2、充分relax

3、迅速记忆

Issue的典型立场

Agree P104 3

Disagree P108 47

闪光句型：结论

1. to sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility cause the evidence cited in theanalysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains. Tostrengthen the argument, the arguer would have to provide more evidenceconcerning

2. moreover, it would be necessary for the arguer to rule out all theabove-mentioned possibilities before we can better evaluate the argument.

3. As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logicallyacceptable, the arguer would have to demonstrate that

4. additionally, the arguer must provide evidence to rule out other possiblecauses

5. To conclude, this argument is not persuasive3 as it stands. Before we acceptthe conclusion, the arguer must present more facts to demonstrate that

6. To solidify4 the argument, the arguer would have to produce more evidenceconcerning

7. In summary, the conclusion reached in this argument is invalid5 andmisleading. To make the argument more convincing, the arguer would haveto prove that

8. Moreover, I would suspend（推迟） my judgment about the credibility of therecommendation until the arguer can provide concrete evidence that