句子比较多，麻烦老师了，这类目前分词是不是是对应的状语类型：
1 Having been painted red, 缘由状语 the building stands out among the rest and looks very attractive.
2 There is no greater pleasure than lying on my back in the middle of grassland ,staring at the night sky. 随着状语
3 Having spent the past year as an exchange student in Hong Kong,缘由状语Linda appears more mature than of her age.
4 Having spent nearly all our money , 缘由状语 we couldn’t afford to stay at a hotel.
5 Lionel Messi，having set the record for the most goals in a calendar year, 缘由状语 is considered the most talented football player in Europe.
6 He got up late and hurried to his office, leaving the breakfast untouched. 结果状语
你对以上句子中目前分词作状语的类型的理解是可以讲得通的。但，不一样的读者或许会有不一样的理解， 不必强求。
比如：He went to the office, leaving the breakfast untouched.
所有些分词作状语都可以理解为随着状语，提供一个谓语动作的背景或伴发状况。至于时间、缘由、结果、让步等都是读者依据个人对句子逻辑的理解而剖析出来的，并非语法结构决定了是何种状语。一个人可能觉得分词作缘由状语，另一个人可能觉得这是时间状语。都是可以的。重要是要了解这是状语，是陪衬谓语动作的。谓语表达的是主要信息，状语表达的是次要信息。假如说话人需要听话人了解状语是何种状语，他刚开始就不需要分词作状语，而是用状语从句，从句的连词会了解对你说这是什么状语。说话人用分词作状语，本身就意味着分词作何种状语不是说话人要表示的重点，重点是分词的动作是次要的。理解了这一点，就不要纠结分词到底干什么状语，根据你对句子的逻辑理解就能。分不了解的时候就剖析为随着状语，永远正确。